I think that this peer review was better than the first one. This time around I felt I gave sound advice, even when it was dealing with something bad. Also I believe the advice I got was better and will will really help with my revision. This is not to say the first peer review was bad because I believe it allowed the class to break the ice on editing. I know I got the hang of it the second time around.
I liked and disliked wetpaint. One the one side it was good because mostly no body knew it was you editing. Call me a wimp, but I think it is harder to be unbiased when the person you are editing knows you who you are. On the flip side, because we were not assigned editors, some people, me included, looked like they did not get as much advice as others. Some people got 4 or more edits while the last time I checked I only had one person edit my paper.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment